[11]cwill,actaetscriptaaedentroversiiselesiaegraecaeetlataesaecⅪpositaextant,leipzigandarburg1861,pp150-2
[12]ibid172-204
[13]ibid85-9;65-85;89-92;168-71
[14]ichel,kerullarios1,44ff
[15]ichel,kerullarios1,76ff,and2,41fftheauthorshipofthepanopliaisdisputed:5laurent,eo31(1932),105ff,andjugie,b8(1933),323ff,regarditastheworkofanteporaryoftheunciloflyonscf,however,ichel&rso;sreply,&lso;vonphotioszukerullarios&rso;,roartalschr41(1933),125ff,andespecially&lso;dieechtheitderpanopliadesi插elkerullarios&rso;,orienschrist36(1941),168ff
[16]deceri264and528psels1,30(edrenauld),。
[17]onzoe&rso;saandthedateoftheaessionofroan3(15noveber1028)cfskabalanovic,vizgosudarstvo11,note2,and14,note1forfurtherchronologicaldatacfalskabalanovic&rso;scarefulstatents
[18]scylitzes-cedren2,486,7,scylitzes&rso;statent(2,486,8)thatnstante8hadalreadyrelvedtoabolishtheallelengyonisalsignificant
[19]dolr,&lso;dasfortbestehenderepiboleittel-undspatbyzzeit&rso;,studialbertoni2(1934),3ff,undbz35(1935),14,atas,oppositiontoystatents&lso;steuerde&rso;1ffandb6(1931),227ff,thattheepibolesurvivedtothelaterperiodthisisntradictiontothepnstatentsoftheurcesandisfurtherdisprovedbythenewaterialbroughtforwardbygrouillard&lso;l&rso;épiboléautepsd&rso;alexisnéne&rso;,b10(1935),81ff,spiteofdolr&rso;sargunts,bz36(1936),157ffcfalthetextsscepubli射dbygrouillard-pllop,actesdelavre1(1937),nos43,48,53,wherethewordepiboleisfreentlytwiththeurcesofthelaterperiod,butisalwaysedtheneralsenseofataxleviedoradistributionofland(asrightlydicatedbybréhier,stitutions260)。
[20]thisisclearlyshownbytheashburnertreatise§§12and14(eddolr,fanz-verwaltung119)cfostrogorsky,&lso;steuerde&rso;31
[21]cfthelegalrulgsofagisteretathithepeira,zepos,j4,32(8,1)and38(9,1);cfal51ff(105,10);167(10l,12);228(l7,1)。
[22]cfrjan,&lso;unistrebyzant:jeanl&rso;orphanotrophe&rso;,eo30(1929),431ff
[23]scylitzes-cedren2,521,saysthattherewerethenanydifferentkdsoftaxthathewasashadtoenuratethe
[24]psels1,57(edrenauld;transsewter,60)。
[25]cfzlatarski,&lso;werwarpeterdeljan?&rso;annalesacadscientfennicae27(1932),354ff,andistorija2,41ff,whoarguesthathewasfactagrandnofsauel(thenofgabrielradoirbyhisarriatoahungarianprcess)butcflitavr,bolgarijaivizantija379ff,whoisrightlycautio
[26]cfjirecek,schichte1,231ff
[27]leispopadukljana,edsisic,34f
[28]thiscertalytookplaceafterthevictoryof1042,butnotidiatelyaftervoislav&rso;sreturnfrobyzantecaptivity,asjirecek,schichte1,231,seestosuppose,andalistorijanarodajugoslavije1(1953),239itisclearfrotheaountofthepriestofdiocleareferredtoabovethatzachiawasnotunderthentrolofvoislavatthetiofthebyzanteattackonzeta1042
[29]neuann,weltstelng64ffakesanunsuessfulattepttowhitewashhi
[30]onpselscfpbezobrazov,i插ilpsell,osw1890;chrzervos,ichelpsellos,paris1920;arabaud,&lso;ichelpsellos&rso;,etudessurl&rso;histoirebyzante(1912),111-71;diehl,figures1,291-317;neuann,weltstelng81-93(thebestandoststiulatgdiscsionofpsels);erenauld,?tudesdelalangueetdustyledeichelpsellos,paris1920;jhsey,&lso;i插elpsels,thebyzantehistorian&rso;,specu10(1935),81-90andchurchandlearng73ff;btatakis,laphilophiebyzante,paris1949,161ff;jdraseke,&lso;adebyzanzdesⅪjahrhunderts&rso;,neuejahrbfdklassaltertu27(1911),561-76;5valdenberg,&lso;filofskievzgljadyi插ilapsella&rso;(thephilophicalviewsofi插elpsels),vs(1945),249-55;pjoannou,christlichetaphysikbyzanz,1dieilationslehredesi插elpsellosundjoannesitalos,ettal1956;cfalthebibliographyoravcsik,byzantoturcica1,2nded,439ffonxiphilcfkgbonis,,texteundforschzurbyz-neugrphilol24(1938)。
[31]cffuchs,hohereschulen24ff;zervos,ichelpsellos(1920),76ff;hsey,churchandlearng51ffcfaljhsey,&lso;thebyzanteepiretheeleventhcentury:differentterpretations&rso;,transactoftheroyalhistciety32(1950),71ff,wheretheauthordisagreeswithofyviewsonthedevelopntofthebyzanteepiretheeleventhcenturyandwouldpassaorefavourableverdictonthisperiodbyreanofitsachieventsthefieldsoftellectualandreligiolifeiwouldnotunderestiatesuchachievents,buthereicanonlyreferverybrieflytotheireffectonthepoliticaldevelopntofbyzantiu;thistookispriarilyncernedwiththebyzantestateandthepoliticalspheretheeleventhcenturyprovedtobethefatalturng-potwhenitsdeclebegan